So Esquire, along with Aspen Writers' Foundation are hosting a
short, short fiction contest. I first saw it on KatySue's
blog. I didn't have the sense to click on this picture,
so I was in the dark, and wondered what on earth the 78 word thing was about. I follow NaNoWriMo on facebook, and later that day I saw that they had posted about the Esquire contest, so I assumed that KatySue got it from that. Little did I know she got it from a blog she followed, and not from facebook at all.
While Esquire isn't exactly the type of reading material I would choose, the challenge intrigued me. So I did it, wrote a story in 78 words. I did enter it in the contest, even though I didn't like the looks of the magazine I figured it couldn't hurt to enter. In fact, I probably would have blogged about this before, but I am paranoid and didn't want to put my short, short on the web till I had entered it into the contest, because it is just so good I know someone would try to steal my idea.
78 Words
(or When Words Appear)
The story of humanity came to a
man as he sat, idly holding his pen. The story spoke of all the pain in the
world, and all the joy. The man realized what he had written only after the
last word had been penned. In his excitement, he accidentally spilled his glass
of water onto the paper, washing the story away. He tried to capture it again,
but each time he tried, only an ugly perversion would appear.
So there it is. A story in 78 words, the best I could make them. For me, it was surprisingly hard to write. (KatySue wrote and finished hers in about five minutes.) Sure, initially when I wrote it, I told myself I would not look at the word count and just write till I had finished, then work on any extra words there may happen to be. I finished in about 5 minutes, with 110 words. It took quite a while to figure out what 30 or so words to scratch so the story would still say all I wanted it to say, but not be too long. There was quite a bit of condensing, turning two sentences into one, rephrasing things so they held the same meaning, but used fewer words. For someone who is naturally long winded, it was quite a challenge.
Writing the short, short was more like writing poetry as opposed to a story. It was all about making sure the words fit together nicely while working in a certain amount of space. It was annoying having such restrictions, and I certainly felt at times that the story would be better if I could have had at least 100 words. It's not only about saying what you want to say, but knowing which words to say it with, and how to say it to make it work. It was a good exercise though, especially for someone long winded like me. The process of using fewer words to say as much, (if not more) is a good talent to learn.
Even so, I didn't write in it all that I wanted to. It was, in fact, supposed to end with the man giving up and simply writing a few words that "explained" the metaphor of the story. When I was editing it though, either I could get rid of how it sounded at the beginning, or get rid of that ending. I chose the later. The story sounded clipped and sparse other wise, and I kind of like how now it is kind of left up to the reader to see what the story means to them. One of those instances, actually, where I have said more with fewer words. Before the reader would have had to seen it the way I wrote it, but now the story may move the reader in which ever way the reader needs to be moved.